1. High-Level Financial Overview
The municipality operated with a very large budget structure during this fiscal year, heavily driven by capital receipts and intense fixed asset investments.
Opening Balance: The fiscal year started with a healthy cash balance of ₹3,45,35,390
.Total Receipts: Reached a massive ₹95,07,97,735, driven largely by capital inflows rather than local source revenue
.Total Expenditure: Totaled ₹92,49,24,067, showing aggressive utilization of incoming funds
.Net Surplus (Balance): The year concluded with a net remaining balance of ₹6,04,09,058
.
2. Revenue Receipts Breakdown
Total Revenue Receipts stood at ₹18,70,22,135
A. Tax Revenues (Total: ₹6,30,00,000)
Property Tax (General) was the single largest internal revenue source, bringing in ₹5,00,00,000 (accounting for 79.4% of all tax revenues)
.Profession Taxes combined brought in ₹80,00,000 (divided between ₹55,00,000 from employees and ₹25,00,000 from traders/institutions)
.Entertainment Tax & Cess generated ₹30,00,000
.
B. Fees and User Charges (Total: ₹3,31,10,000)
Building Construction Fees were highly lucrative, generating ₹1,10,00,000
.Regularization Fees (including unauthorized constructions) brought in a combined ₹50,00,000
.Road Cutting Charges brought in a notable ₹30,00,000
.Fines & Penalties: General penal interests, waste dumping fines, and other health/court penalties brought in significant code revenue (e.g., Waste Dumping Fine: ₹10,00,000; Penal Interest: ₹10,00,000)
.
C. Revenue Grants, Contributions, and Subsidies (Total: ₹80,08,66,35)
This represents the dominant item under revenue receipts, meaning state-transferred welfare funds represent the true operational backbone of local support:
Old Age Pension: ₹3,80,51,900
.General Purpose Fund: ₹2,05,37,000
.Widow Pension: ₹1,10,04,000
.
3. Capital Receipts & Indebtedness
Total Capital Receipts reached ₹76,37,75,600
Grants for Specific Purposes: Totaled ₹52,96,75,600, showcasing aggressive funding from central and state-level infrastructure projects (such as Swachh Bharat, AMRUT, and Member of Parliament schemes)
.Secured Loans: The municipality incurred a massive ₹22,00,00,000 loan from K.U.R.D.F.C
. While this provided huge liquidity, it introduced massive future debt servicing requirements.
4. Expenditure Analysis
The expenditure profile reveals a massive push toward structural asset creation alongside robust social sector spending.
A. Revenue Expenditure (Total: ₹44,33,98,938)
Establishment Expenses (₹4,47,80,500): Dominated by permanent staff salaries (₹2,20,00,000) and monthly honorariums/sitting allowances for councillors/members (₹40,00,000)
.Operation and Maintenance (₹6,55,28,000): Dominated extensively by the Repairs & Maintenance of Roads and Pavements (₹3,41,43,000) and Water Supply repairs (₹1,10,00,000)
.Service Sector Programs (₹21,10,97,283): A huge operational spend category. The single largest line-item expense here was Public Drinking Water (₹10,06,50,000), followed by Allopathy Medical Institutions (₹1,56,02,893) and Local Government Housing Electrification Initiatives
.
B. Capital Expenditure (Total: ₹48,15,25,129)
The capital budget was primarily utilized to build out physical community infrastructure:
Fixed Assets (Total: ₹42,59,66,449): The municipality went through an aggressive development cycle
. The largest allocations were poured into:Bus Stand Buildings: ₹22,00,00,000
.Administrative Buildings: ₹10,00,00,000
.Marriage Hall / Community Centre Buildings: ₹3,50,00,000
.Concrete Roads: ₹1,94,00,219
.
Payment of Recoveries (Total: ₹5,13,18,730): Cleared massive short-term staff financial liabilities, including ₹1,40,00,000 in Provident Fund Loans and ₹1,05,00,000 in Provident Fund Payables
.
Summary Verdict
The 2025-2026 revised budget paints a picture of a growth-heavy, investment-oriented fiscal year
While it effectively managed to complete the cycle with a ₹6.04 Crore cash balance surplus, it set up an expansive dependency on external grants and future loan repayments that will shape the local body's budgets for years to come